An /r/askreddit question asks what subreddit people wish they could ban. /r/theredpill is quickly posted and some users are unhappy at its nomination. (np.reddit.com)
SubredditDrama
204 ups - 0 downs = 204 votes
238 comments submitted at 06:24:21 on Sep 30, 2014 by zuriel45
>(a) want to have sex with someone you have manipulated into sleeping with you (b) want to be with someone who doesn't know who the real you is or (c) want to be with a woman that would be attracted to a fucking asshole?
According to the redpill philosophy, all women are manipulative snakes who care more about a man's earnings than their personality, which I guess allows them to rationalize being manipulative and fake themselves. That and they tend to view women as worthless but for their holes and childbearing capacity, so why would they care if women actually like them for who they really are?
> or you're such a misogynistic sociopath that manipulating women makes you feel good about yourself (even more depressing)
So not far off.
I think that the sub is split between lonely, rejected teens/young adults, bitter divorcees, and people who are straight-up abusive psychopaths. I'd say that the majority is in the first category, which is a good thing because they can be rehabbed once they discover that their life doesn't become any more fulfilling through a misogynist lens. It's pretty blatant that most of them are trying to blame the world for their problems; a couple weeks back I posted some screenshots to /r/thebluepill of people on Wizardchan, the imageboard for adult virgins, that parroted redpill terms and ideas. Most of them really can't make it any clearer that they adopted the ideology as a desperate attempt to find a place in the world, which is really more embarassing than antisocial. Many of the frequent posters and endorsed contributors, though...I wouldn't want to come within a hundred feet of them. Pure evil.
It's funny because you could say the same about the new feminism/ sjw movement.
I mean, you could say that. You'd be wrong, of course; but you could definitely say it.
Because you said so? Lmao.
I think you'd have a hard time even defining the "new feminism/sjw movement" because it's all over the fucking place and filled with crazy people who have a shit load of infighting between themselves.
You are also missing the forest for the trees
Okay, so people who believe things are all the same because they believe things.
That's a terribly dismissive and anti intellectual response. It also seems like you are unable of critical thought, or you are purposely avoiding it. Look up the horseshoe theory, going "herp derp they believe different things" means nothing.
More Comments - Click Here
You could, sure, but it wouldn't really make any sense
That false equivalence bullshit is really tired. it never works.
Why? They're both the 2 ends of the horseshoe. It makes sense that extremists of both ends are similar. I can't imagine anyone but the willfully ignorant not seeing it. Also judging by the downvotes it looks like I really struck a chord there. I'm not saying that that post doesn't describe red pillers, just that it also describes the other end. It's uncanny even. Like it was done on purpose. Some sort of meta trolling. I could see someone posting that then giggling at all the irony as it's upvoted here.
Extremists on both ends are not similar
Feminists are not similar to TRPers
Fascists are not similar to communists
This is exactly the false equivalence bullshit I was talking about. It does not reflect reality. Goddamn.
Also feminism in its dictionary definition (gender equality) is wayyy more mainstream than TRP, which if you mention it IRL will probably get you confused looks of OMG are you a psychopath (rightfully IMO).
Yep, even if the word came from the french movement (I think) that was specifically for women's rights, the meaning has changed like so many other words and it's now about all people's rights.
Looks like willfully ignorant was correct. "Herp derp red pillers and feminists don't support the same thing!" You're missing the forest for the trees honey.
Also funnily enough the horseshoe theory is originally about politics.
You're not getting downvoted because you're wrong, but because you fail at conversing without being condescendingly smug about what you perceive as a point of view only you can see. Argue along, snowflake.
Lol nothing's smug at all about my first post cutie. Just downvoted because all the brds/SJWs on srd don't want to hear it. Jesus there's a disgusting slant in this subreddit now. Everyone shitting on red pillers then when someone mentions SJWs being ridiculous too, bam downvotes.
More Comments - Click Here